Assessing students seems to be a very touchy subject for some teachers because there are so many different ways of doing so. Running Records offer an evaluation of “text reading” and often indicates how well children are directing their knowledge of letters, sounds, and words while comprehending the material they are reading. I think the use of running records would be helpful because any texts can be used for Running Records. Running Records seems to be a reliable source in examining each student’s reading process, but also seems like it would take a lot of time to assess every student in a class. I think if teachers want to implement this type of assessment in their classroom, they have to carefully prepare and take time to do it correctly so the results are reliable.
Classrooms today are more diverse in academic level than they have been in the past, so I think it is important to meet every student’s needs by offering leveled books in a classroom. Before reading the “Matching texts and readers…” article I did not realize how detailed the criteria for leveling books was. The article really illustrates the importance of every aspect included in a book, and how that can determine what level a particular book falls into. One thing I really liked about the article was that it broke each level into sections and carefully described each, so the reader has a good idea of what kind of books would be classified in each level. Although providing leveled books in the classroom is important, it is also crucial for teachers to provide other types of reading material as well.
In the “Looking inside classrooms: Reflecting on the “how” as well as the “what” in effective reading Instruction” article the authors discuss a different findings from the first year of a larger national study on school improvement in reading. The results really surprised me. They talked about how whole-group instruction was seen more often than small-group instruction. I found this interesting; because I think that small group instruction is more beneficial to students and teachers when it comes to reading. Another thing that I found interesting is that students observed were involved more in passive responding than actively participating. As a student, I know I learn better by actively participating in a lesson and learn more when I am engaged through writing and reading. I agree with what the article says about teacher “telling” students instead of coaching them. There are times when “telling” is necessary, but there are many times when teachers should steer away from doing so.
I found Richard L. Allington’s article, “The Schools we Have. The Schools we Need” to be very interesting. I agree with him, in that teachers often do mistake a lack of experience for a lack of ability. I pre-interned at Lonsdale Elementary last spring and many of the students there do not have experiences with books, stories, or print. Many of them do not have access to reading materials, however those limitations do not have an effect on their intellectual ability. It also does not mean that children coming to school with a lot more experiences with print, books, and stories are going to have the ability to read at a high level. I was exposed to so many reading materials as a child, but still struggled as a beginning reader. Allington makes a great point- it is so important that all students have ample opportunities to engage in reading and writing activities. I think that teachers should work together to find ways provide more opportunities for students to develop strong literacy.